Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Kingfisher Project – Immingham

THE BRIEF

RWC were engaged by Saipem to undertake marine and shoreside civil engineering services for a Pre-FEED study for a FSRU berth at Immingham, UK. The project comprised a new jetty head an associated dolphins connected to the shore by a 1.2km pipe track and trestle. Once ashore the gas was piped (overground and underground in directional drill) to the power station and refineries around 5km away. RWC were part of a multi-disciplinary team covering all aspects of the project.

VALUE-ADDED SOLUTION

The project would be completed under a DCO and an assessment of the likely environmental restrictions was made as a key assumption. RWC completed navigational assessments for bringing ships to the berth and agreed these with the Harbour Master. Delivering within a tight capital cost budget was a key parameter from the outset. RWC developed a scheme design that eliminated raker piles and focused on delivering the whole of the works as quickly as possible within the DCO constraints on percussive piling. A method related cost plan was built “bottom up” and combined with the shore side plan which was informed by specialist designers.

FINAL OUTCOMES

The final report provided a design, programme and cost plan that could be delivered within the defined budget and supported the original business case. The project did not proceed due to volatility in the price of gas and a marginal business case.